CONTROLTOWER OS is priced around the consequential pathway, deployment scope and assurance required — not tokens, generic API calls or user seats.
Engagement progresses through controlled commercial stages so that scope, evidence and execution boundaries remain explicit before production commitment.
Request a controlled discussionCONTROLLED COMMERCIAL PROGRESSION
Each stage is bounded by the pathway, evidence, integrations, operating environment and assurance requirements agreed for that engagement.
€4,500 fixed
One defined consequential AI-to-action pathway. Boundary identification, authority/control-condition assessment, current evidence/control review and written CTOS fit determination.
From €9,500
One bounded governed pathway; frozen proposition; defined evidence inputs; CONTROLTOWER OS governance conditions; controlled disposition logic; evidence preservation; written result and proof boundary.
From €30,000
Customer-specific controlled pilot before production commitment, including scoped configuration/integration, governance controls, evidence handling, acceptance criteria, controlled testing and final pilot record.
From €60,000 annuallyImplementation from €15,000
Annual enterprise CONTROLTOWER OS production service for an agreed production scope, including the governance, policy, evidence and execution-control capabilities required by that contracted scope, plus controlled change management and standard written support.
Custom quotation
Complex, multi-environment, regulated or high-consequence deployments involving enhanced security, assurance, integrations, governance or operating requirements.
PRICING BASIS
CONTROLTOWER OS is not primarily priced by user seats, prompts, model tokens or generic API traffic. Commercial scope is determined by the governed consequential pathway, deployment complexity, required integrations, operating environment and assurance requirements.
CONTROLTOWER OS fees cover the CONTROLTOWER OS service and contracted implementation scope. External model, audit, cloud, data or other third-party services are separate unless expressly included in a written quotation.
Where an external audit provider such as ViriSIM is used, its commercial relationship remains separate unless expressly agreed otherwise.
External audit information is an evidence input. It is not automatically CONTROLTOWER OS authority for consequential progression.
Prices are stated in euro and exclude VAT, applicable taxes and third-party service charges unless expressly stated otherwise. Published prices are starting prices and do not constitute a binding quotation. Final fees depend on agreed scope, deployment complexity, integrations, assurance requirements and contractual terms. Payment does not itself satisfy technical, governance or production-acceptance requirements.
CONTROLTOWER OS pricing is shaped by the governed consequential pathway, deployment boundary, integrations, evidence and control requirements, assurance needs and contractual scope—not primarily by seats, tokens or prompts.
Consequential pathway, required integrations, deployment environment, evidence controls, assurance obligations and contractual requirements.
CONTROLTOWER OS service and the implementation scope expressly included in the written quotation or agreement.
External model, audit, cloud, data and other third-party services remain separate unless expressly included in writing.
Qualified organisations can request appropriate commercial, trust, information-handling and technical-assurance material during controlled evaluation.
Use these criteria when deciding whether an AI or automation pathway needs execution control, monitoring, audit, or a combination of controls.
Last reviewed: 6 September 2026
AI execution control governs whether a machine-supported decision is permitted to progress into committed action. The control point sits between machine decision and operational consequence, before a workflow sends, approves, updates, dispatches, escalates or triggers a downstream system.
It is most relevant where an AI agent or automation can create operational, regulatory, financial or system-level consequence and a wrong progression cannot be treated as a routine reversible exception.
Monitoring observes behaviour and audit examines evidence or outcomes. Execution control determines whether progression is admissible before committed action. External audit evidence can inform the decision, but does not automatically establish authority to proceed.
Where output remains advisory, committed action is independently blocked by an existing control, consequence is low and reversible, or the primary requirement is observability, model assessment or post-event review, a separate execution-control layer may not be necessary.
No. Pricing primarily reflects the governed consequential pathway, deployment, integrations, evidence and control requirements, assurance needs and contractual scope.
The commercial route begins with a €4,500 fixed Fit Assessment, followed where appropriate by Controlled Evaluation from €9,500, Governed Pilot from €30,000 and Production Deployment from €60,000 annually plus implementation from €15,000.
For the public evidence boundary, review Evidence & Validation. For enterprise due diligence, review Trust & Assurance. For delivery method, review the Governed Pilot. For the contracting entity and disclosure posture, review Company.
REQUEST DISCUSSION
Use the existing controlled discussion route to identify the appropriate commercial stage and establish the scope that requires assessment.